On a tear

I started the day with a library run. On more or less a whim I picked up a recent collection of articles on Welhaven, and I found the perfect jumping off point for my little polemic on Norwegian Romanticism, an article by Eirik Vassenden called something like “Welhaven og den andre romantikken.” He does a great job of presenting the perfect evidence for my claim, and then turns around and essentially argues the exact opposite. So strange!

At any rate, it really got me going, and I wrote quite a bit in response, and also did some digging in the literary histories. I checked out Edda‘s editorial policies, and noticed that they also have a shorter category of article that the publish that the designate as debate contributions. I’m wondering if I perhaps should aim for that format?

WORDS WRITTEN: 923

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s